Tuesday, September 7, 2010

DON’T QUESTION SOCIAL CONTRACT OTHERWISE THE MALAYS WOULD GET ANGRY AND GO ON AM...OK

DON’T QUESTION SOCIAL CONTRACT OTHERWISE THE MALAYS WOULD GET ANGRY AND GO ON AM...OK. WHAT IS SOCIAL CONTRACT IS DETERMINED BY UMNO AS IT SUITS US. IF YOU QUESTION MALAY RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES THERE WOULD BE BLOODBATH. MALAYS ARE SUPREME RACE WHO CANNOT BE QUESTIONED!!
NAJIB CAN YOU TELL US WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION???THE SECOND PART OF ARTICLE 153 TALKS ABOUT THE LEGITIMATE INTERESTS OF OTHER COMMUNITIES??UMNO CAN STEP AND TRAMPLE ON THE NON-MALAY RIGHTS AND YET WHEN THEIR CONDUCT IS QUESTIONED THEY THREATEN US WITH VIOLENCE AND BLOODBATH.

ARENT THERE ENOUGH MODERATE MALAYS WITH GUTS OUT THERE TO ORGANISE A DEMONSTRATION IN SUPPORT OF EQUALITY AND THE RIGHTS OF NON MALAYS???ARENT THERE ENOUGH MODERATE MALAYS WITH GUTS OUT THERE WHO WOULD DARE SAY ALL HUMAN BEING ARE BORN EQUAL UNDER THE SUN AND THE LAW OF NATURE??See More
By: Waytha Moorthy

Ops Padam Hindraf ASP loses defamation suit and ordered to pay cost of RM7,000 to Senior Hindraf Coordinator.

asp vasanthakumar
clip_image002
 NO.6, Jalan Abdullah, Off Jalan Bangsar, 59000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Tel: 03-2282 5241 Fax: 03-2282 5245

Website: www.humanrightspartymalaysia.com Email:info@humanrightspartymalaysia.com

Media Statement (6/9/2010)

Ops Padam Hindraf ASP loses defamation suit and ordered to pay cost of RM7,000.00 to Senior Hindraf Coordinator.

This morning (6/9/2010) the Kuala Lumpur High Court Judge Datin Zabariah Othman dismissed ASP Vasantha Kumar’s civil suit No S-23-6-2010 for defamation against Hindraf National Coordinator Tamil Selvam A/L Krishnasamy and had ordered ASP Vasantha Kumar to pay K.Tamil Selvam costs of RM7,000.00.

In his defamation suit ASP Vasantha Kumar had alleged that Tamil Selvam had at a Press Conference held at Rawang and reported in the Tamil daily Makkal Osai on 8/7/09 said :-

1) referred to Vasantha Kumar as a “suspected” police planted guy in Hindraf “who made wild accusations on Hindraf and it’s true leaders.

2) ASP Vasantha Kumar was since the day of his “release from ISA” had been alleged to have been throwing wild accusations on Hindraf.

3) The Hindraf struggle is not for money but about poor Indian rights championed by P.Waythamoorthy and P.Uthayakumar who are the true leaders leading Hindraf. The fact that Hindraf still exist because of P.Waythamoorthy and P.Uthayakumar and we maintain and sustain the real struggle under their leadership till today.

4) Why are they (ASP Vasantha Kumar) attacking Hindraf. They are diverting the real struggle staged by true Hindraf leaders.

In the written submissions to the Kuala Lumpur High Court, Tamil Selvam’s lawyer P.Uthayakumar had submitted that:-

“ (4) Plaintif telah secara mencurigai dan/atau dengan niat dan/atau motif serong enggan dan gagal memberitahu pekerjaan sebenarnya dalam menyangkal persepsi umum yang beliau adalah seorang pegawai dari pasukan polis perisik Cawangan khas E3M.

(5) Walaupun Defendan (Tamil Selvam) telah lama terlibat dengan Hindraf sejak tahun 2006, tetapi Defendan (Tamil Slevam) telah tidak pernah mendengar nama atau berjumpa dengan Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) sehingga lebih kurang tiga bulan sebelum Plaintif kononnya ditangkap dan ditahan dibawah Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (ISA) (yang dinafikan disini).

(6) Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) dalam kesemua kertas caranya telah tidak menyatakan bila sebenarnya beliau telah menjadi seorang pemimpin Hindraf, siapa yang melantiknya dan dalam keadaan apa beliau telah menjadi seorang pemimpin Hindraf.

(7) Kecuali Plaintif, (ASP Vasantha Kumar) tidak ada sejarah di Malaysia dimana seseorang telah ditahan dibawah ISA dengan penglibatan untuk tempoh hanya cuma selama tiga.

(8) Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) telah “diistiharkan” sebagai seorang Ketua Hindraf hanya oleh Ketua Polis Negara pada 13/12/07 iaitu hari beliau kononnya ditangkap dan ditahan di bawah ISA.

(9) Plaintif telah gagal memberikan kronologi dan sejarah NGO-NGO yang diceburinya, jawatan- jawatan yang dipegangnya dan dokumen- dokumen sokongannya dalam membuktikan yang Plaintif bukanlah seorang pegawai dari pasukan polis perisik cawangan khas E3M.

(10) Satu Google search telah dibuat oleh Defendan (Tamil Selvam) mengenai nama Plaintif yang tidak menunjukkan sebarang “postings” langsung mengenai nama Plaintif sebelum 13/12/2007 iaitu tarikh kononnya beliau ditahan dibawah ISA.

(11) Pertanyaan (Inquiries) Defendan (Tamil Selvam) menunjukkan yang tidak ada mana- mana ahli politik atau ahli NGO yang mengenali Plaintif sebagai seorang aktivis politik atau aktivis NGO sebelum kononnya penahannya di bawah ISA pada 13/12/2007.

(12) Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) adalah seorang individu yang penuh bermisteri dan telah layak menjadi kononnya “pemimpin Hindraf” hanya semata- mata berdasarkan kepada kononnya penangkapannya dibawah ISA pada 13/12/2007 oleh Ketua Polis Negara.

(13) Tugas dan tanggungjawab Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) selepas kononnya dibebaskan dari tahanan ISA adalah jelas hanya untuk mengelirukan dan memecah- belahkan Hindraf dan masyarakat India melalui terutamanya akhbar- akhbar dan media massa Tamil.

(14) Plaintif telah hanya membuat “bare denials” kepada tohmahan- tohmahan Defendan diatas dalam Jawapan kepada Pembelaan (oleh Plaintif) sebelum daripada ini.

(15) Jika diteliti keseluruhan afidavit sokongan Defendan yang telah diikrarkan pda 5hb April 2010 kemusykilan-kemusyikilan yang sangat serius telah dibuat mengenai identiti sebenar Plaintif dan perwatakan dan peranannya yang penuh bermisteri dalam Hindraf.

(16) Tetapi dalam afidavit balasannya Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) telah hanya dalam perenggan keempat Afidavit balasannya yang telah diikrarkan pada 10hb Ogos 2010 cuma secara “kosong” (bare denials) dan tidak mahu menjawab kepada persoalan Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) tersebut telah cuma menjawab seperti berikut:-

4. Saya mengikrarkan Afidavit ini untuk menjawab Afidavit Defendan (K.Tamil Selvam) dan merujuk Perenggan 6 hingga 27 dan menyatakan seperti berikut:-

a)Pernyataan-pernyataan Defendan (K.Tamil Selvam) adalah tidak relevan, berskandal, penafian dan pernyataan kosong dan remeh;

b) Defendan (K.Tamil Selvam) tidak mendedahkan apa-apa merit dalam Afidavit Defendannya mahupun alasan yang diberi dalam Permohonan Defendan;

5. Saya menegaskan bahawa tuduhan-tuduhan yang dibuat oleh Defendan (K.Tamil Selvam) tidaklah berasas, tanpa bukti dan adalah suatu yang berunsur niat jahat dan dengan tujuan untuk mengelirukan Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini.

(17) Perenggan Keenam sehingga Kedua-puluh tujuh afidavit Defendan K.Tamil Selvam tersebut adalah dua-puluh satu perenggan tetapi jawapan Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) adalah cuma tiga perenggan sahaja seperti diatas.

(18) Jika Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) berani mengapa dan kenapa Plaintif enggan/gagal/cuai menjawab kepada kemusykilan-kemusykilan yang ditimbulkan oleh Defendan (K.Tamil Selvam) satu per satu seperti yang dinyatakan dalam Pernyataan Pembelaan Defendan (K.Tamil Selvam) dan juga dalam duapuluh-satu perenggan dari perenggan 6 hingga ke 27 Afidavit Defendan (K.Tamil Selvam) yang telah diikrarkan pada 5/04/2010 seperti yang dinyatakan diatas.

(19) Oleh kerana Plaintif (ASP Vasantha Kumar) takut kepada kebenaran maka Plaintif berselindung disebalik perkataan “tidak relevan” dan sebagainya seperti yang telah dinyatakan di atas”.

Lawyer P.Uthayakumar appeared at the Kuala Lumpur High Court this morning for K.Tamil Selvam. ASP Vasantha Kumar is represented by lawyer G.Ragumaren. K.Tamil Selvam’s solicitors M/s Kumar Hashimah & Co has today sent a letter to Vasantha Kumar’s solicitors G.Ragumaren & Co demanding the award court cost of RM7,000.00 to be paid to K.Tamil Selvam forthwith and in any event within (7) days from today.

Hindraf maintains that ASP Vasantha Kumar is not known to both P.Uthayakumar or P.Waytha Moorthy or any other key Hindraf members until about three months before the Hindraf Rally on 25/11/07 and in fact had spoken to lawyer Manoharan Malayalam for the first time only at the Kamunting prison. ASP Vasantha Kumar remains a mysterious character up to date.

Despite police reports lodged, the Inspector General of Police has yet to reveal the truth as to who is this ASP Vasantha Kumar, whether this ASP Vasantha Kumar is indeed an E3M police special branch officer planted into Hindraf and assigned to create confusion, break up Hindraf under Ops Padam Hindraf Neither has the IGP replied to Items No 4 to 19 hereinabove.

S.Jayathas

(Information Chief Hindraf)

Raja Petra: Non anti Indian starts with Malaysia Today also publishing pressing Indian problems.

raja petra
Dear PRK, my response on your take on HINDRAF – R. Shan (Human Being)
The first thing that irked me is your statement

“There are those who say I am anti-Indian or anti-Hindraf. My outspokenness towards a single-race struggle has been condemned as that of an anti-Indian or anti-Hindraf stance. And many who propagate the Hindraf cause have taken me to task for this perceived ‘anti’ stance. Maybe it is time I made my stance clear, for whatever it is worth”.

Frankly, I don’t think there is any truth to it. Nobody questioned you nor indicted you in the cyber world if you notice that you actually do not carry any HINDRAF news at all unless it actually warrants for whatsoever reasons that you decide to publish it.

I guess the rebuttal that you face is if alike others for a political reason, you ran an oiled agenda to portray them as racist but now you make your stance, therefore there are quite a considerable sympathizes who would castigate you to clear the air even with your so called the elite NATO commenter’s.

You say the HINDRAF case should be a Malaysian cause, let’s look at the factual aspect of it. Tell me or show me how many of the moderate bloggers and liberated bloggers from either the Malays or other non Malay carry their news? Look even at Malaysia Today, even they don’t carry HINDRAF news to ensure the tilt of the artificial power of the arm chair critics stays in course without making an actual change.

Now, I look back and ponder, how have this “semua tahu” community in the comments have made the change that most desire for others, other than voicing their frustration as tomorrow is just another day in their day to day life but not for those in poverty and discriminated. Sure we are also discriminated, but we are with choice not those without choice yet we sit and brood irrespective of race, religion or color.

Sorry, RPK, I maybe blunt in my approach but I alone cannot defeat the forces of evil unless and until I recognize the purpose in such exercise that can benefit Malaysians at large. That purpose can only exist if you are genuine in your approach rather than to pander to those commenter’s who will talk about the whole nine yard yet when action is required, swivel into their coconut shell for their own needs. Please enlighten me how many of the the ultra vires bloggers or alternative media carry HINDRAF/ HRP news or why they have not approached HINDRAF?

Just look at the some of the comments on your site on this article, they don’t even know what they are talking about, because, you are just a temporary reprieve for the moment until you exist, then it is history as they will move on in their own way and you will in your own way .

RPK, I feel rather than giving political and appeasing speeches, we should support any cause that addresses the needy and those deprived even if it involves a certain segment of a group. It has to start somewhere. Nobody denies that others are as vulnerable as the Malaysian Indians are in the current situation, but the nonchalant attitude towards Malaysian Indians should not be used as a political agenda as and when it fits an agenda.

I think, HINDRAF knows what it wants for the poor and the poverty stricken to salvage even if it starts with the Malaysian Indians, but more pertinent is people need to be more akin to their agenda on a humanity aspect rather than that appeases our glorified commenter’s.

For a start in a pro active manner, you should include and highlight HINDRAF / HRP issue as often as you can in your site amongst others, then we would know that you actually mean what you say.

R. Shan (Human Being)