Thursday, November 11, 2010

Dei!!! Anwar Ibrahim do you know what courtesy is about? (MalaysiaToday

1074_anwar-ibrahim-dato-seri-e1269072624672-150x150 By Jakun Malaysia

I was just watching the clip: http://www.malaysiakini.tv/video/20494/hrps-attempt-to-hand-over-memo-to-anwar-fails.html.

You should look at the end of it where Anwar’s kuncu picked it up and squashed the memorandum that was left at his gate in his residence and threw it away.

I don’t think even UMNO imperialist had treated those HINDRAF/HRP supporters with such ignorance save for the incident in Perak where the police officer pushed down the memorandum to the Sultan that was placed on the police car.

Sure, Anwar goes around Malaysia shouting, ”Anak Melayu, anak kita, anak Cina anak kita, anak India, pun anak kita. Mengapa harus kita bezakan?”

So, how does this equate to the hypocrisy that you had shown to the memorandum that was brought to you? This was a grievance that was brought forward and I can understand if it was UMNO. But you as the De facto leader of the opposition, never did I imagine this.

Isn’t it a fact that most PKR supporters are Malaysian Indians? And to wonder that these Indians will stand hand in hand with you when you can treat their fellow Malaysian with such disregard. The least is to have the courtesy to accept the memorandum as opposed to throwing it away.

Do you seriously think that Malaysian Indians are lacking in pride and dignity that they would just accept anything that is thrown to them? You saw the action with HINDRAF, that every one of you opposition politicians rode on to gain your mileage. Now when you are in power in your respective states, the concerns for the Malaysian Indians are through your irrelevant mandores for the similar hegemony that you practice like UMNO.

Mistake, Anwar. You did jackshit in your Reformasi drive in 1999. It is we the minority who put up with everything for the betterment of the majority that provided the impetus to create the change that emancipated us in 2008.

This incident clearly depicts the immaturity, lack of humanity and courtesy on the part of PKR politicians besides its typical rhetoric than we have seen in UMNO.

Cakra Guna’s self immolation: HRP Demo at Anwar Ibrahim’s house demanding land for all Hindu temples and cemetaries, Tamil schools and Indian villages in Selangor Penang and Kedah.

anwar ibrahim
(See Malaysia Nanban 10/11/2010 front page)
Cakra Guna’s Self Immolation 1
Cakra Guna’s Self Immolation  2

IMG_0416 IMG_0430 IMG_0433 P1000717

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Gunasegaran’s immolation: Funeral procession to Anwar Ibrahim’s house (If anything happens) demanding land for all Hindu Temples & cemeteries, Tamil Schools & Indian villages on wholesome basis and not piecemeal basis

Gunasegaran bakar diri halang PKR,DAP & PAS roboh Kuil Hindu Puchong. Jika apa2 berlaku perarakan mayat depan rumah Anwar Ibrahim d Segambut protes Anwar,Lim Guan Eng & Hadi Awang tak beri geran tanah kepada semua Kuil, Sekolah Tamil, Setinggan India & Kubur Hindu d Selangor,Penang & Kedah untuk penyelesaian tetap. HINDRAF HRP Sebarkan
image

Man sets himself on fire to stop demolition

By FMT Staff

PETALING JAYA: A 52-year-old MIC man today set himself on fire in an attempt to stop local council authorities from demolishing two wooden structures belonging to a Hindu temple in Puchong.

He suffered severe burns on his face and stomach and is being treated at the Serdang Hospital. It is learnt that his condition is critical.

The drama unfolded this morning when a team of enforcement officers from the Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ) arrived at the Sri Srinivasa Perumal Temple in Pusat Bandar Puchong to tear down the two wooden structures.

The two structures, which the enforcement officers said were illegal, housed the temple's chariot and was used as a store room.

They were located in a land belonging to the Castlefield Tamil School. The temple itself is located at the other end of the land. The temple committee has been using the structures on the land for the past 10 years with the permission of the school.

As soon as the enforcement officers arrived, Puchong MIC division information chief M Gunaseelan tried to stop them from proceeding with the demolition.

“When they failed to listen to him, he climbed onto the roof of the wooden store room and set himself on fire,” said an eye-witness.

Gunaseelan then rolled down the roof of the building and fell on the ground. Several people then help to douse the fire on him.

He was immediately whisked away to Serdang Hospital where he has been placed under the ICU. No one is allowed to visit him. His family members are keeping vigil outside the ICU ward.

School wants kindergarten
The wooden structures were torn down by the MPSJ enforcement officers who were assisted by Rela personnel. They are scheduled to return tomorrow to complete their task to clean up the place.

FMT learnt that the school wants to build a kindergarten on the plot of land where the two structures stood. The temple, however, has its own plan to convert that spot to build a marriage hall.

Last-minute pleas by the temple officials for the demolition to be stopped were brushed aside by the MBSJ officials.

It is further learnt that the MPSJ officials were brought to the spot by a contractor who was bidding to build the kindergarten.

The school claims that part of land was given to it by a contractor and it had only allowed the temple to squat on it.

MIC Youth chief and Puchong division leader T Mohan told FMT that the matter could have been settled amicably between the school and the temple.

“We are now talking to them so that we can resolve this issue. The structures have been demolished but we will have to see how to move forward so that both the school and temple can make use of this land,” he said.

He also hoped that Gunaseelan would recover soon from his burn injuries.

“It is shocking. I have not been able to see him at the hospital but I hope he will be okay,” he said.

Letter Of Complaint To The UN High Commissioner For Human Rights Denial Of Fundamental Right Of Primary Education To Malaysian Indian Children

Letter Of Complaint To The UN High Commissioner For Human Rights

Denial Of Fundamental Right Of Primary Education To Malaysian Indian Children

I write this complaint of a serious violation of fundamental Human Rights on behalf of a community of plantation workers, former and current, in a rubber plantation called Ladang Batu Kawan in the State of Pulau Pinang in Malaysia.

This community has resided in this vicinity for over one hundred years, since being brought here to man the plantation from South India. At least 6 generations of school children have been brought up in the little estate school called SJK(T) Ladang Batu Kawan, prior to it being destroyed in a fire in 2002. The school moved to its current location close-by. At this current location the school is housed in a small house of a former estate clerk topped up with 4 units of transportation containers. There are a total of 134 students as of Oct 2010 in this school. The school has eleven Teachers plus a Headmaster.

The Human Rights violation and the content of our complaint is that the young of this community, one of many such communities in Malaysia has been systematically denied their basic rights to sound Primary education as a result of racist Government Policies. The lopsided application of the national resource away from communities such as these is driven by racial motivation on the part of the Malaysian Government. We have no recourse within the country to effectively address this problem, so we raise it to the United Nations and we hope that the UN will intervene on our behalf. Equality is not treated as a natural order in Malaysia. This complaint is a cry for help. We do hope that your Office as a Supervisor for worldwide human rights will rise to the occasion and help us in our need.

The Malaysian Federal Constitution states that:

Article 8. (1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the

equal protection of the law.

Article 12. (1) Without prejudice to the generality of Article 8, there shall be no discrimination against any citizen on the grounds only of religion, race, descent or place of birth—

(a) in the administration of any educational institution maintained by a public authority, and, in particular, the admission of pupils or students or the payment of fees;

or

(b) in providing out of the funds of a public authority financial aid for the maintenance or education of pupils or students in any educational institution (whether or not maintained

by a public authority and whether within or outside the Federation).

As you can make out from the above, the Malaysian Government is in serious violation of these Constitutional guarantees. This school, like so many others like it, has been in this state of dilapidation for over 53 years, since independence. Yet, the Malaysian Government feels no compulsion whatsoever to redress this situation, in spite of the guarantees given in the Constitution at the formation of the nation.

There is a large allocation of National Annual budget towards education. That allocation has been mostly directed to schools other than these former estate schools. As an indication of this bias, in the period 1995 to 2000 the allocation to these schools was just 1% of the total allocation for Primary schools. 50 % of the Malaysian Indian children or about 100,000 Indian children attend such schools. 50 % of the future of a community is in jeopardy and all the social indicators point to a devastating future if nothing is soon done about this problem of foundational education. As it stands, Indian youth involvement in crime is the highest among the three main ethnic groups, Indian youth are underemployed and human capital is wasted in very low value adding vocations, suicide rate is highest among the three ethnic groups. These are but some indicative statistics of the dire nature of the situation and very clearly point to a community in distress.

Our specific complaint is that this is all a systematic result of the racist policies of the Malaysian Government where the minority Indian poor in Malaysia continue to be considered immigrant laborers and treated as second or even third class citizens – much like the colored and black people were treated by the Apartheid South African regime in the heydays of Apartheid. As a result of this National Policy of conscious neglect, this school in Batu Kawan Estate has been totally starved of development funds leaving it in this dilapidated condition – it has no library, it has no playing field, it has no proper canteen, it has no computer, the children sit in sultry and hot cabins during class and there is no room for any growth, it does not sit on its own land. The Batu Kawan School is but one sample of the 370 partially aided Tamil Primary schools throughout the country, whose fates are not much different. I believe the young Indian children derive their self worth from this foundational education. This systematic deprivation hits them and the future of the entire minority Indian community at the core. Something must be done soon.

In addition, we want to raise to your attention that Malaysia is signatory to the following key UN conventions and has treaty obligations to observe these Conventions. Malaysia is in breach of the following covenants of the conventions below;

1) Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Article 1.

* All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

* Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Article 26.

* Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

2) Convention on the Rights of the Child

Article 2

* States Parties shall respect and ensure the rights set forth in the present Convention to each child within their jurisdiction without discrimination of any kind, irrespective of the child’s or his or her parent’s or legal guardian’s race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status.

Article 28

* States Parties recognize the right of the child to education, and with a view to achieving this right progressively and on the basis of equal opportunity, they shall, in particular:
o Make primary education compulsory and available free to all;

Given this sordid state of affairs, it is our humble request that the United Nations intervene in this situation in a manner appropriate to relations between the UN and member countries and provide the motivation to the Malaysian Government to urgently and seriously address this acute problem of deprivation of sound Primary education to the minority Indian citizens of Malaysia. For what is at stake is more than funds and hardware, it is the future of a significant minority community of the country.

We are available for any further information that you may require and we can be contacted at the above address. We are forwarding this letter to you through the office of the United Nations Development Program Office in Kuala Lumpur and we will appreciate a positive response from you.

Thank You.

Yours sincerely,

Kalai Selvan

The Human Rights Party of Malaysia

State Committee Chair (Pro Tem)

State of Pulau Pinang

Penang Address: D1 – 3 -15 Bandar Perai Jaya 3,

13600 Perai,

Pulau Pinang,

Malaysia

Handphone No: 60125637614

Email: kalay1210@gmail.com

Cc: Hon’ble Ban Kim Moon

Secretary General Of the United Nations

Cc: Mr. Kamal Malhotra

Country Officer

UNDP office

Kula Lumpur






Sunday, November 7, 2010

M'sia impoverishes the Hindu gods

My grandpa and grandma 'live' in a Buddhist temple - the Penang tourist attraction which features the very huge reclining Buddha. My grandparents' ashes are in two urns side by side, these urns sit in niches in the wall.

The wall paintings in the temple depict scenes from Prince Siddharta's life, and used to captivate me when I was a small child. The Gautama was Indian although some Malaysian Chinese are unaware of his historical origin. They mistakenly think the Buddha is Chinese, akin to how some Christians are unaware that Jesus was a Jew.

religion malaysia 070306 buddhist templeSince olden times, the Indian sub-continent which is the birthplace of Buddhism has had advanced civilisations and a rich tradition of philosophical thought. It's a heritage that our Tamils here can rightly be proud of.

Like the Buddhist wall paintings I remember of my childhood temple visits, Hindu sculptures are something soulful to look at too. The Hindu pantheon has such vibrant colour (literally, Lord Krishna is blue-skinned) and vitality. There is also Hinduism practised at a more abstract plane by deeper thinkers.

Unfortunately, some belonging to the Abrahamic faiths (Islam, Christianity) are ill at ease in the presence of idols. This uneasiness is the problem of the Muslims and the Christians, and not the Hindus. If these followers of the monotheistic religions harbour a superiority complex and intolerence of idols, then they are the ones being obnoxious.

Temples have their own spirituality (just as the grand cathedrals of Europe are awesome); it's up to the individual to be able to experience it. Bali, the Hindu isle of 1,000 temples, is the most charming place. Especially charming are the flower offerings that ones sees everywhere. It is a gentle, loving nature that can so appreciate flowers.

Phenomenon of converts

There is really no reason at all for Christians and Muslims to feel they are superior to Hindus and insist on proselytising. Why should they? On the contrary, converts are abhorrent when they behave like the Kong Kali Kong ustaz or Shah Kirit, the Muslim missionary who mocked Hindu practices.

You have to admire the patience and kind understanding of the Tamils who need to put up with the pushy behaviour of their fellow Malaysians.

indian crowd malaysia 291107It is unfortunate that Tamils here are not in the most advantageous position due to exclusion by the Malays in the public sector and the Chinese in the private sector. Tamils are subjected to double-whammy discrimination. Especially if he is dark.

Indians with darker skin have to cope with more racial prejudice than their lighter-toned cousins. Malaysia is hardly an egalitarian society. Therefore, our colour-consciousness (read: prejudices) exacerbates the poor position of Hinduism in the pecking order where the various religions are sadly treated corresponding to the economic status of their adherents.

In this matter of being respectful of the weaker communities or minorities, Malaysia fares badly; as we generally do in our world ranking in areas like corruption, media freedom, and other social indicator indexes.

NONEThe Tamils are derided for the unique phenomenon of their makeshift shrines under the trees. Since it is the state that is giving Indians a rotten deal, then we should take issue with the people running the state. The bureaucracy cannot absolve itself of fault should poor people necessarily worship at even poorer houses of God.

It's a fact of life that not only do Tamils live in poverty here, their gods are impoverished by the state as well.

Every time a Muslim steps into a magnificent mosque in Malaysia, does he feel more than a twinge of guilt that his fellow Malaysians are praying in shoplots and pathetic premises?

Liberal suckers-up appeasers

Islam is in a category of its own, being the religion of the federation. Article 12(2) of the federal constitution allows the country, or the states, to establish or maintain Islamic institutions, or to provide instruction in Islam - all at government expense.

If a society's moral progress is measured by how it treats its most powerless and vulnerable members, what does one then make of the Bangsar Malaysia liberals who delight in appeasing Muslims while ignoring the plight of Hindus? It doesn't take a whole lot of spine to be sucking up to the most powerful force in the country, does it?

To me, it is the Hindus who possess the higher moral consciousness as I have great respect for people who respect other living creatures. There are the most number of vegetarians among Hindus. They're the people who are least likely to be trigger-happy dog shooters as Hindus do not commit gratuitous violence on animals.

'Ahimsa' is a term meaning 'to do no harm' and is an important tenet of Hinduism and Buddhism.

deepavaliThere's no cause for misguided Indians who convert to other religions to turn around and deride Hindus. On the other hand, there's every good reason for a Hindu to feel comfortable in his own skin and to take pride in his religious beliefs and customs.

So keep up the good fight, Hindraf. Happy Deepavali to Hindu readers and may your light shine on the wilfully blind.

Event 8//11/2010 : DAP’s Batu Kawan Tamil School in Cabin. Memo to UN by Penang HRP & HINDRAF

Tamil.School5
image
HRP & HINDRAF Penang will hand over Memo on ethnic discrimination of Batu Kawan Tamil School in cabin to United Nation on:-

Date: 8th November 2010

Time: 11.00 am

Address: WISMA UN, Block C, Damansara Offices Complex Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights, 50490 Kuala Lumpur.

For more information please contact:-

K.Kalay- 012-5637614

K.Maran- 012-5557522

G.Annadurai 017-4107244

Your presence will enhance our noble course. Please support.



“RIGHTS NOT MERCY”

S.JAYATHAS

Information Chief

Friday, November 5, 2010

Malays is only for 15 years – Tun Razak. End UMNO racism and religious supremacy and Malaysia being the world’s most racist country.

images[2] Hindraf has done it’s homework at the Public Records Office (National Archives) in Kew, London on 3rd June onwards. To start off with there is no such thing as the social contract as UMNO has been repeatedly proclaiming, insisting and conveniently implementing their bully racist and religious supremacist policies.

The social contract is a very recent phenomena created by a mere UMNO Member of Parliament. In 1986 Datuk Abdullah Ahmad the Member of Parliament for Kok Lanas, Kelantan he said;

“The political system of Malay dominance was born out of the sacrosanct social contract which preceded national independence. Let us never forget that in the Malaysian political system, the Malay position must be preserved and that Malay expectations must be met. There have been moves to question, to set aside and to violate this contract that have threatened the stability of the system”.

“The May 1969 riots arose out of the challenge to the system agreed upon out of the non fulfillment of the substance of the contract. The New Economic Policy (NEP) is the programme after those riots in 1969 to fulfil the promises of the contract in 1957.”

The NEP must continue to sustain Malay dominance in the political system in line with the contract of 1957. Even after 1990 there must be mechanisms of preservation, protection and expansion in an evolving system (Abdullah Ahmad, quoted in The Star newspaper, 31, Viii 1986) – Marvis Puthucheary – Malaysia’s “Social Contract” in the book Sharing the Nation by Noraini Othman and two others at page 12.

Written records of the interparty discussions of the Alliance leaders indicate that the Constitutional provisions on the “special position” were understood more as a protective measure for the Malay community which was then socio-economically disadvantged. Referred to by Raja Aziz Addruse and Helen Ting (NST 6/7/08 page 22).

In their oral submissions to the Reid Commission the Alliance leaders requested the insertion of a constitutional provision for the review of the “special position” of the Malays 15 years after independence. Though subsequently removed, this implies that the Alliance leaders themselves did not intend the provisions to be a permanent feature of independent Malaysia.

The founding political bargain was later construed as and renamed “the social contract.” The original alliance “deal” or pragmatic compromise was “rebounded” and given legitimacy by association with modern liberal and democratic political philosophy and it’s core idea of the “social contract” of free and equal citizens as joint stakeholders in the political order. Marvis Puthucheary – Malaysia’s “Social Contract” in the book Sharing the Nation by Noraini Othman and two others at page 20.

For example, earlier work suggest and the recently published memoirs of Tun Dr. Ismail confirm that the “special position” of Malays in the Constitution was interpreted as nothing more than ‘a temporary measure to ensure their (Malay) survival in the modern competitive world (Ooi 2006 : 83), a temporary ‘handicap’ as in golf to encourage and support Malays in the key competences of modernity while they so to speak, lifted and improved their game. These special Malay rights, Tun Ismail held, should not apply in perpetuity, only for a very limited period, and would not last any longer than that. The ‘slur” of their continuing existence would ensure their termination before very long at Malay insistence and from a determination to uphold Malay self respect. Marvis Puthucheary – Malaysia’s “Social Contract” in the book ‘Sharing the Nation’ by Noraini Othman and two others page 23.

As per Hindraf’s research at the Public Records Office at Kew, London on 3rd June 2007 onwards, we noted that at the hearing of the Reid Commission on 27/9/56 at 10.00 a.m, Tun Razak had said that the special position of Malays should be reviewed 15 years after Independence. Chairman Lord Reid had asked, “Are you putting any period of compulsory review”, and Tunku Abdul Rahman replied that the suggestion is that there should be a review every 15 years. The main thing the special position of Malays should be reviewed every 15 years. Chairman.” “15 years for Federal and State” and the Tunku replied, “Yes (ref page 34,35 and 36 of 50 Years Of Violations Of The Malaysian Federal Constitution by (the UMNO controlled) Malaysian Government by P. Uthayakumar dated 28/7/2007.

It is therefore plain and obvious that in pursuance of the UMNO Malay muslim supremacy agenda in particular in preserving the Indian poor and creating the future Indian poor, UMNO has refused to implement the second limb of Article 153 (1) which guarantees the legitimate interests of the non Malays (in particular the Indian poor). But UMNO has abused the first limb of Article 153 (1) which provides for Malay Special Privileges and the non existent social contract to implement Malay muslim supremacy to the brim. So much so that after 53 years of independence Malaysia has evolved to become the world’s most racist and religious extremist and supremacist regime when the last such regime was put to an end with the demise of the South African apartheid regime.

P. Uthayakumar
http://www.humanrightspartymalaysia.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/social.jpg

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Hindraf man told to enter defence

SHAH ALAM: A butcher charged with taking part in an illegal gathering, organised by the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) three years ago, was ordered by the Sessions Court yesterday to enter his defence.

K. Raghu, 43, is alleged to have taken part in the illegal gathering at the Sri Subramaniam temple in Jalan Besar, Batu Caves, between 1am and 8am on Nov 25, 2007.

Judge Hasbi Hasan ruled that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against Raghu. She set Nov 25 for the defence.

However, she acquitted Raghu on a second charge of using criminal force against a policeman and causing disturbance by damaging seven vehicles in front of the temple at the same place and time.

Hasbi said there was insufficient evidence to call for his defence.

Counsel S. Karthigesan appeared for Raghu, while deputy public prosecutors Idham Abdul Ghani, Hanim Mohd Rashid and Devinderjit Kaur prosecuted.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

HINDRAF & HRP Deepavali Wishes: UMNO Narakasura must be “Politically Killed” in 2012-2013 General Election

We look Forward the day 2012-2013 Deepavali when Narakasura UMNO is politically killed. The victory will triumph over the evil UMNO regime.
Register as a voter at HRP 15/38 project to create Indian majority seats.
Please mobilize all your contacts to register as voters and forward to all.
S.JAYATHAS
HINDRAF & Human Rights Party (HRP)
Information Chief

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Will Pakatan commit to a roadmap for true democracy?

P. Waytha Moorthy, HINDRAF Chairman

Many have forgotten that Pakatan Rakyat and the agenda to capture Putrajaya at 12th general election became a reality after the tsunami of HINDRAF on November 25, 2007. Till then, even the top leadership of Pakatan never for once imagined the prospect of reaching so close to Putrajaya. The cry of Makkal Sakthi reverberated in every household irrespective of race or creed. Yes, there was a shift of the mindset of the grassroots Indians, which was the main cause of the now forgotten impact caused by the Indian voters.

The great tsunami brought about the much spoken about “change” by the PR leadership.

Pakatan can’t go on with the rhetoric of change without defining its true meaning. Since gaining tremendously in the last GE they have been talking about the change that is needed for Malaysia. Promises of accountability, openness and eradication of corruption have been made to convince Malaysians of their agenda of “change.”

But let us be honest – these promises are good on paper but the true change starts with what is being done for the poor and discriminated. Every aspiring politician speaks those words which are no more than vague promises made without commitment or convictions (what we call kosong politics).

For a Human Rights Movement like Hindraf/HRP, which represents the poor, and underclass, those promises are meaningless. Honestly, it does not matter to the poor man suffering on the ground level if politicians are corrupt or if the country will be provided with good governance should there be change of Government. The poor man needs to be fed first. He needs an income. He needs a house. The almost half million internally displaced Indian labourers’ from the estates need to be provided with compensation for their displaced lives, training opportunities to cope with their displacement, proper relocation and affordable housing.

Since 1975 they have become the new urban poor and underclass who are suffering on a daily basis. A large number of them are stateless and a good 150,000 such stateless children are not attending schools because the UMNO Government dictates so. By virtue of being stateless, many are unable to avail of the basic benefits of healthcare, social welfare, employment, driving licenses, acquire property, etc. What does it matter to these men and women if a new PR government is not corrupt or can provide good governance. These promises of change do not matter to them.

PR should understand their version of change is only cosmetic when viewed from the point of view of the common man, leave alone the underclass. True democracy requires much more inclusive change not continuing benefits to only those who are already benefiting from the UMNO crafted system. Instead, they need to come out with a bold new commitment for true change and draw a road map for true democracy.

It is time the main component parties of PR, the PKR shed their UMNO, MCA and MIC mentality (I say this because PKR is filled with BN rejects) and start thinking seriously about getting rid of a REGIME. The UMNO regime has been monopolising, bullying, plundering and shortchanging the country and its people for a good 53 years and everyone realises this.

So talk of capturing Putrajaya should be backed up with a concrete commitment for CHANGE instead of mere rhetoric’s.

So what Democratic changes are we looking for?

Let me list down the following basic democratic changes, which in our opinion mean TRUE CHANGE;

1) Clear and unambiguous commitment to the principles of Equality for all as stipulated in Article 8 of the Federal Constitution.

2) Strict adherence to the original spirit and intention of the drafting of Article 153 of the Malaysian Constitution, i.e. the Special Position of the Malays and Natives in limited areas and not the false notion of the Malay Special Privileges and the “sapu bersih/habis” concept that have paralysed non-Malays and stymied the country for 53 years.

3) Commitment to amend the Federal Constitution to incorporate a truly impartial and independent Constitutional Court and its composition of Judges takes into account seniority, experience and appointment are to be open and transparent and consists of members of all races equally.

4) Protection of Freedom of Religion as enshrined under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. All conflicts of religious status of persons etc should be adjudicated in the civil courts.

The original intention of amendments to Article 121 (1) of the Federal Court should be strictly adhered to, i.e. that the role of Muslim syariah courts, are to strictly adjudicate upon matrimonial and property matters involving Muslims only as per the debates and adoption of the new article 121 1 (A) in the Parliament Hansard in 1988.

All places of worships belonging to non-Muslims are to be equally recognised as PLACES OF WORSHIP (many do not realise that non-Muslim places of worships do not have a status) and land titles issued and permanently gazetted. Provisions be made under Federal funding for the establishment of new places of worships for all religious groups in a fair and orderly manner in new townships and the government to provide for its maintenance as granted to Muslim places of worships. Land titles granted to all places of worships, which had existed before Merdeka and the rights of these Religious groups be respected.

All persons are allowed to choose a Religion of his/her choice without state interference.

5) PR commits taking over responsibility of Education fully, i.e. to provide land and funding equally for all schools including vernacular schools and upgrade and maintain all vernacular schools and schools belonging to minority groups, equally without discrimination. The responsibility of Education of all classes of citizens would be shouldered by the Government and the distinction of fully aided and non-fully aided school should be abolished.

6) Commit to revamp and clean the Police Force and civil service of its current corrupted particularly the top ranking officers.

7) Return the status quo of the monarchy prior to the amendments of 1981.

8) Commit to providing welfare and housing assistance of quality to all Malaysian poor equally under the welfare and housing ministry programs without any segregation/discrimination on grounds of race and religion.

9) Commit to the formation of a Royal commission of Inquiry into the Racist Agenda of BTN, which has trained almost 80% of its Civil servants to implement racist policies in Malaysia.

10) A royal commission and a truth and reconciliation commission to inquire into the abuse of power and corruption of UMNO regime over the past 53 years since independence.

11) Give the Borneo states its promised autonomy as per the 1963 Malaysia agreement and hold a commission of inquiry to investigate the issuance of citizenships to more than 1.5 million Muslims from around the region of Philippines and Indonesia which intended to dilute the Christian population in Sabah of their Political power. Return 50% of its wealth in natural resources back to the Borneo states for it to administer.

12) To revamp and draw concrete plans to implement new economic programs to benefit all Malaysians irrespective of race and Religion and announce these proposed plans before the next GE.

13) To pass a new Race Relations Act to make racial segregation/discrimination a crime in line with the International standards.

14) To adopt and ratify all International Human rights treaties and bring Malaysia on par with modern democratic society in the United Nations.

15) To revamp the Human Rights Commission to give it the power to initiate and recommend prosecutions independently of the Attorney-General and these recommendations are to be adhered by the Attorney-General (commit to amend the Federal Constitution to make the necessary changes). The appointment of members of the commission to be made open and transparent and its composition to be of people with integrity and credible Human rights record and contributions.

16) To make an immediate commitment to resolve (not look into) the plight of the marginalized society that is plaguing the country which includes;

* The estimated 350,000 stateless Malaysian born Indians.

* Provide equal economic, social and educational opportunities for all marginalised community and declare openly programs and workable budgets to bring them on par with other communities and place them in the mainstream economic agenda.

17) To fully implement recommendations of the Royal Commission to enhance the operation and management of the Royal Malaysian Police established by the King on 4th February 2004. To form an independent Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate the extra-judicial killings committed by the Royal Malaysian police.

18) To reduce annual defence budgets and mega projects and commit to allocate a minimum of RM5 Billion per annum to uplift Malaysia’s marginalised society and further RM5 billion of National wealth to help spur economic activity amongst the poor and marginalized.

19) To abolish the Internal Security Act and the Sedition Act and all repressive Laws and provisions in the Police Act, Printing Press and Publication Act, etc.

20) Commit to liberalise licenses/permits for publications and allow free airtime equally to all political parties during General Elections campaign period.

The above are the true democratic changes that we in Hindraf/HRP would like to see. Would PR share our dreams for a better Malaysia?

It is an insult to one’s intelligence to float the idea and notion that “they must vote us in because UMNO is evil and we will bring about changes”!

What changes are you talking about Pakatan? We do not wish to be fooled into voting for change only to find ourselves being oppressed by the new forces of Change!

The PKR-DAP-PAS Axis

The PKR-DAP-PAS axis is suspect. They can’t see eye-to-eye in a real sense but somehow seem to have tasted limited power and aspire to take full control of the country on a loosely knitted coalition based on some amorphous notion of democratic change. PAS strongly advocates an Islamic state and ideology and will never accept the International standards of democracy and humanity. DAP on the other hand advocates socialist democratic principles but once tasted limited power in Penang has shown they are no more capitalist than UMNO and are equally capable of betraying the trust placed on them when within a year of coming to power they demolished the Kampong Buah Pala, committed gross violations of human rights of the poor of Kampong Buah Pala.

Worse, now they are bending backwards just to please PAS for the sake of Malay Muslim voters with Guan Eng claiming to take a leaf from a Caliph and DAP MP’s wayang kulit of selendang clad visits to suraus. We have never seen even the mandore parties MCA or GERAKAN doing that but we see that aplenty with the LIM dynasty hell bent on grasping power at all costs. PKR on the other hand is filled with UMNO, MCA and MIC rejects and formed not to champion a political cause but more as a vehicle for Anwar Ibrahim to become the next Prime Minister. Any new comer who aspires for a change and reforms are termed as chameleons and branded as planted to destroy within.

So how can a purely Human Rights Movement like Hindraf and HRP trust the suspect alliance of PKR-DAP-PAS axis? I believe we are not the only ones in doubt. I have personally spoken to many NGO’s and friends in the Human rights circle and they are in agreement that PR is not genuine in bringing about change that they often speak of. Why should genuine grassroots movement like us take their words as gospel truth when they dare not even spell out in the open their change and reform agenda? I challenge the top leadership of PR come in the open to say that I’m wrong and they are committed to the above changes which I believe many peace and democracy thirst Malaysians would love to see.

Would they? No, I don’t think so. They are just not ready for the true CHANGE. We have to take this country out of its slumber and rebuild Malaysia into a progressive and democratic country. To do this there must be genuine political will for Democracy, Good governance and Human Rights.

But what kosong politicians would like to champion and portray is Human Rights from top to bottom. For us in Hindraf/HRP, we are committed to the fundamental principles of Human Rights of individuals and not the Human Rights of the privileged.

So wake up PR and stop demonising all who speak the truth and say what is right and just.

Up until the Kampong Buah Pala saga, HINDRAF was a gem of a Movement because it delivered the 80% Indian votes free of charge to PR. The moment we stood our ground on the KBP issue and the subsequent inaction and inefficiencies of state PR Governments we fell into the list of an extremist and fanatical movement. Have you guys forgotten that this was the very same label UMNO painted on us on a daily basis in their media post 25/11? And yet the grassroots were with us because they recognize we ARE THEIR TRUE VOICE.

I had the opportunity to speak to Dato Seri Anwar as early as January 2009 on the inefficiencies of the respective PR state Governments and had requested for urgent meeting to look into ways on how we could complement each other and help the Pakatan states overcome their so-called teething problems in solving the main issues affecting the Indians. Unfortunately he never got around fulfilling his promises perhaps because of our stand on the KBP issue, for which we do not regret. It surprised me when labels of racist outfit were painted by him when he clearly understood the issues and pertinent questions, which I had raised during the many tele-conversations I had with him in 2009.

The Political structure of Malaysia is so used to Mandore Politics that I feel the Pakatan leadership does not want to disrupt that set up as much as BN as they would be more comfortable with “weak Indian leaders” who are either not educated, non-professionals or the elite Indians who are aware they do not command the grassroots support and hence need to cling on to PR leadership in the ticket of being multi racial leaders.

We in Hindraf/HRP are committed to not only break loose from the shackles of UMNO hegemony but also the Mandore system which has been used by both divide of politicians to rule and control the grassroots Indians. It appears it is in the interest of both UMNO and Pakatan to stop us from breaking this Mandore system as it is easier to deal with the Mandores in their respective parties than dealing with a strong movement which is committed towards the cause of Human rights and stands its grounds of principal rather than accept some bread crumbs contracts and funds thrown at them. For taking a principled stand we are termed racist and extremists.

Today it is Zaid who is slaughtered for saying and wanting to take the right direction. He is being demonised and branded a racist and chameleon sent by UMNO to break the party from within. Last year, it was Sabah’s Dr Jeffrey. It is rumoured that Anwar did not want a Christian Sabah leader and he was targeted as a traitor for his Borneo autonomy demand. Is Pakatan going to demonise each and every Movement and individual who are not in tandem with their vague and uncommitted politics?

We in Hindraf/HRP are in no hurry. We are prepared to wait another 53 years if it means ultimately getting a true democratic country. After all, the blacks in America fought a “war” for more than 200 years to be recognised as equal citizens. The Indians fought another 250 years to gain independence. It took centuries for the French to be rid of the monarchy.

All those people endured torture and contempt. We in Hindraf/HRP have just started crawling but we will never be cowed nor bought with the offer of privileges of the powerful. Yes we are a minority community and may not have the numbers to bring about changes we want. But believe me, in time to come, Malaysia would eventually realise the true form of democracy and we and our great grandchildren would wait and continue the struggle till then. WE ARE IN NO HURRY, WE MAY OR MAY NOT ACHIEVE OUR GOALS IN THIS LIFETIME BUT WE HAVE DEFINITELY SOWED THE SEEDS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY IN MALAYSIA.

RIGHTS NOT MERCY

Memo to Menteri Besar Johor, UMNO denies land for Masai Hindu Graveyard

1st November 2010 at 11.00am, Human Rights Party together with concern citizen handover memorandum to Johor Menteri Besar regarding land denied for Masai Graveyard. Memorandum collected by Encik Sharul (Pegawai pembantu pentadbiran Menteri Besar Johor).
01112010154
HRP at Johor Menteri Besar office. from left: G.Subramaniam, S.Magesan, En.Sharul, Y.Mohan (Johor HRP Chairman) & Perumal. 

MEMORANDUM

MEMORANDUM KEPADA YAB DATO’ HAJI ABDUL GHANI BIN OTHMAN – MENTERI BESAR JOHOR BERKENAAN TANAH PERKUBURAN DI MASAI DAN DI KAWASAN SEKITAR JOHOR BAHRU YANG SUDAH PENUH DAN TIADA TEMPAT LAGI PADA MASA KINI.
HRP5

Salam sejahtera,

Kami dari Human Rigths Party Malaysia (Interim), mewakili kaum India beragama Hindu di sekitar kawasan Masai khususnya dan kawasan sekitar Johor Bahru secara amnya ingin menggesa kerajaan Johor di bawah pentadbiran YAB DATO’ HAJI ABDUL GHANI BIN OTHMAN – MENTERI BESAR JOHOR supaya masalah Tanah Perkuburan di Masai dan Johor Bahru diselesaikan dengan segera memandangkan tiada tempat untuk tanah perkuburan.

Untuk pengetahuan pihak kerajaan, tujuan utama kami memberi memo ini ialah untuk mendapatkan sebidang tanah perkuburan baru dan juga mengkaji masalah tanah perkuburan di Masai.

01112010151Kami menggesa kerajaan supaya:

1) Mengenal pasti Tanah Perkuburan yang baru di Masai dan bagi kawasan sekitar Johor Bahru.

2) Membuat satu siasatan rasmi di Tanah Perkuburan Masai berkaitan penggunaannya memandangkan didapati masih ada ruang tetapi tidak digunakan. (Dikhuatiri kawasan paya)

3) Memandangkan Tanah Perkuburan lain disebelahnya sudah penuh dan diberi tanah di tempat lain kecuali bagi beragama Hindu.

Situasi sekarang.

Situasi sekarang tiada tempat untuk dikebumikan / dibakar. Tetapi masih ada ruang untuk ditanam dan dibakar. Tempat pembakaran tidak dijaga kerana kebanyakan mayat dibawa ke perkuburan Cina untuk dibakar secara elektrik yang terletak di Sungai Tiram, Tiram dimana ia terletak lebih kurang 30 KM dari Masai. Untuk pengetahuan pihak kerajaan, bukan semua mayat Hindu boleh dibakar kerana menurut agama Hindu ada yang mesti kena bakar dan ada yang mesti kena tanam. Tetapi sekarang semuanya kena dibakar dan itupun di Perkuburan Cina. Masih lagi menumpang mayat. Kesemua masyarakat India Hindu terpaksa berbuat demikian dan mereka ini melingkungi kawasan Pasir Gudang, Kota Masai, Masai, Seri Alam, Plentong, Kong Kong dan Permas Jaya.

Persoalan masyarakat Masai pula ialah, Tanah Perkuburan Masai yang digazetkan pada 22/07/1962 dan diluluskan pada 2/07/1963 (Plan no: 25429 dan Lot no: 2127) seluas 1.75 ekar yang diuruskan oleh Subramaniam Temple Masai, kini tiada tempat lagi. Jika ada pun ia adalah paya dan persoalan mereka ialah adakah kesemua tempat ini digunakan sepenuhnya. Sudah lebih 10 tahun tiada kes perkuburan disini dan tiada tanah baru.

Untuk pengetahuan tuan, masalah sebenar bukannya tak boleh bertoleransi semasa pembakaran mayat di tempat orang Cina (dimana perkara ini tak akan diterima oleh agama lain), Cuma bila ia melibatkan mereka yang miskin, mereka terpaksa bayar lebih untuk bakar mayat kerana hanya mereka yang menumpang kawasan perkuburan sahaja boleh merasai rasa duka yang teramat. Kereta mayat sekarang memberi pakej perkuburan yang melibatkan paling kurang RM 5000. Mereka yang miskin terpaksa untuk mencari ALONG untuk mendapatkan wang segera agar mayat tidak dibiar begitu sahaja dan mereka akan lakukan apa sahaja termasuk meminjam wang. Terdapat lebih 20 keluarga (yang kami ada sekarang dan mungkin lebih jika kami buat kajian) yang menghadapi masalah Along yang berpunca daripada kematian.

Bayangkan selepas pemergian seseorang, tiada tempat untuk mengkubur dan membakar, yang ada cuma menumpang , dengan berat hati terpaksa membakar walaupun ada yang kena tanam, , terpaksa meminjam wang dari Along, bayar sampai 5 tahun dan lebih. Adakah ini bukannya tanggungjawab kerajaan tempatan dan mereka yang mengurus Tanah Perkuburan? Jika semua perkara perlu demonstrasi dan Memo apa gunanya kami sebagai rakyat India Hindu yang bergenerasi 5 dan 6 keturunan di Malaysia. Adakah kami bukan rakyat Malaysia.

Apakah sebidang tanah perkuburan yang kami minta untuk beribu ribu masyarakat India di Johor Bahru dan Masai adalah keterlaluan? Lagi teruk keadaan kami kerana tiada tempat lagi untuk mengebumikan di Kebun Teh, Johor Bahru.

Apa yang kami menggesa pihak kerajaan ialah:

· Laksanakan segera siasatan di Tanah Perkuburan Masai.

· Kami perlukan sebidang tanahperkuburan segera sebagai tanda menghormati agama dan masyarakat kami.

· Kami bersedia untuk sebarang perbincangan dan jika tiada hasil atau keputusan dalam masa dua bulan maka kami tiada cara lain selain menjunjung mayat ke Pejabat Menteri Besar kerana kami percaya beliau boleh selesaikan masalah ini.

Bersama ini kami sertakan dokumen yang berikut:

* Ditandatangani oleh masyarakat India yang terlibat dalam masalah ini dan orang awam yang mula risau.
* Gambar-gambar kubur Masai pada masa kini.
* Pelan Tanah Perkuburan India, Masai

Sekian, Terima kasih.

Yang Benar,

____________________

(Y.MOHAN)

HRP JOHOR STATE CHAIRMAN

Tel h/p: 019-7102895

Sk1.Yang Dipertua Majlis Pembandaran Johor Bahru Tengah, Skudai Johor.

GAMBAR-GAMBAR YANG DIAMBIL DI TANAH PERKUBURAN INDIA MASAI,JOHOR.
clip_image002
Penyokong-penyokong orang awam yang meminta tanah untuk kubur India di masai.
clip_image004
Tempat membakar mayat yang tidak sempurna seperti bumbung tidak ada dan tidak dijaga lansung.
Tempat ini langsung tidak dipakai lebih kurang 10 tahun lalu.
clip_image008 clip_image006
Kubur India Masai sudah penuhi dan orang awam di kawasan itu dipercayai kubur China sudah memasuki ke kawasan kubur India.sejak lebih kurang 15 tahun kubur India di masai tidak boleh dikebumikan mayat.
clip_image010 clip_image014
Jambatan inilah laluan masuk utama ke kubur India yang tidak sempurna.Hal ini, menyusahkan orang awam melintas jambatan ini kerana takut runtuh bila-bila masa.

HAF Highlights Persecution of Hindus in Muslim-Majority Nations

Washington, D.C. (October 26, 2010) - The Hindu American Foundation (HAF) articulated the extensive oppression of Hindu minorities in Muslim-majority nations at The Plight of Minorities and Expatriates in Arab and Muslim Countries: What the U.S. Should Do,

a conference sponsored by the Center for Democracy and Human Rights in
Saudi Arabia (CDHR).  Drawing upon extensive data in HAF’s 2009 human
rights report, Hindus in South Asia and the Diaspora: A Survey of Human Rights,
Professor Ramesh Rao, HAF’s Human Rights Coordinator, highlighted the
discrimination faced by minorities, particularly Hindus, in Saudi
Arabia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and Afghanistan.


Other presentations focused on the persecution of Copts in Egypt, plight of
Christians in the Middle East, repression of minorities in the Arab
Middle East and Iran, experience of Baha’i communities in the Middle
East, status of Jews in Arab countries, women’s rights under Sharia law,
compatibility of Sharia law with the U.S. judicial system, and
oppression of minorities in Iraq.

Labeling the muted complaints and silence of the media, governments and scholars
in recording this history of oppression of minorities in
Muslim-majority countries as “taboo history,” Prof. Carole Basri of the
University of Pennsylvania Law School urged speakers and participants to
engage lawmakers more vigorously by shedding light on the plight of
minorities in many Muslim-majority nations. Dr. Ali Alyami, Executive
Director of CDHR, said, in his introductory remarks, that
representatives of these persecuted minorities should collaborate and
speak with one voice to give voice to the oppressed in Muslim-majority
nations.

“It was heartening to meet with representatives of the Copts, Ahmaddiyas,
Baha’i, Christians, and Jews at this conference, and join them in
voicing our distress at the fate of minorities, including Hindus, in
Muslim-majority nations across the world,” said Prof. Rao. “It is
important we build on the synergy created in this first meeting and
demand action from our lawmakers and administration officials who have
succumbed to the pressures of the 57 member-nations of the Organization
of Islamic Conference (OIC) by disregarding these atrocities.”

Image Credit: Migom Foto

Monday, November 1, 2010